Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph L. Wiess's avatar

I find it fascinating the parallels between the Koala and the Rainbow Brigade. Because the can't reproduce, they seek to steal others children. When they can't get the opposite sex to like them, they dress up like the opposite sex and have Anal sex.

Unlike the Koala, they are resourceful enough to infiltrate the structures of power and adapt.

In addition, the megacities are full of retarded people that eke out an existence, until they die.

Expand full comment
Tony Ryan's avatar

Frankly, I don't care about koalas because they are a foreign species, at least to me, a resident of the Real Australia, known to both the Jealous and the Proud as the Top End. As people of cerebral stature everywhere recognise, the Top End is a Geographical Gem, surrounded by a series of Planet Earth barriers that protect us and ours from injurious Antarctic climes. These are known as the Central Desert, the State Hinterlands, and the Green Coastal Strips, the latter of which the quasi-suicidal koalas occupy. As do the smaller brain southern human species.

But the Dingoes are a different matter altogether. The Dingoes are our friends. Paintings in rock shelters show us that dingoes arrived about three and a half thousand years ago. That is when the Thylacene ceased to be depicted thus, erased by the more mobile and gang-minded Dingo. Now, topically, this theme lends itself to the Aboriginal arrival timeline, also mentioned by the author, which has recently become somewhat politicised, and for very good reason. I am sure Celaeno will forgive this sequalian addition to his fascinating narrative.

Extant mRNA evidence points to the Pleistocene arrival of a negrito human who eventually populated the entire island continent. With the Holocene Era, came several waves of new arrivals, the ancestors of current Aborigines. mRNA evidence suggests mimimal inter-marriange, to put it delicately, and eventually the negrito remnants were driven to climatic and geographical extremes, these being Tasmania, and the Atherton Highland Rainforests in north Queensland.

Along came some 19th century American anthropologists, who took all sorts of measurements and pronounced these to be negrito pygmies. Under pressure from outraged Australian academics, the Queensland Government rounded these unfortunate survivors up and transfered them to an Aboriginal reserve with strict orders to breed upwards ASAP.

Why? Because one simply cannot create a lucrative national guilt complex aound genocide of a people who had previously genocided somebody else. It's just not done. Like, where is the moral authority?

Yes, stories must be finished as well as begun, and so too must the moral of such stories be revealed. Sorry Albo, but the 'Voice' cannot use the guilt vehicle. Yes, Aborigines are still subjected to genocide and, in fact, it is your government that is doing it, not the entire collection of non-Aboriginal races, 95% of whom had nothing to do with it. This more recent genocide is aided by the very architects of the 'Voice', because they are the very loud, language-less, culture-less, city pseudo-Aboriginese who prevent the competing rural and remote areas genuine people from being heard.

But back to the dingoes, we need the dingoes to keep down feral cat numbers, which are the single biggest cause of native species decline. People of Australia's great antarctic barrier region, please stop killing dingoes. And thank you, Celaeno for creating this marvelous environment for truth-telling.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts