The Protocols of the Gamma Juniors of the Internet

The E-Right’s Foremost Problem

[Since it will no doubt come up, my own views on Zionism and Jews are as follows: I am not a Zionist or any kind of nationalist; nationalism is liberalism, which I view as a profoundly negative force. I have nothing against either Israel or the Palestinians and pray that they learn to live in peace, to which end I encourage those among them who have not yet done so to accept Christ as their King and invite the Prince of Peace to return to His homeland. As a monarchist I hope such a government returns not merely there, but everywhere. I think that Jews (and everyone else) should be treated with respect and dignity wherever they live by reason of historical circumstances. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to question the disproportionate influence organized Jewish groups and the government of Israel have in the US; it’s a topic broached by mainstream academics and broadly discussed across the political spectrum. However, I think it would be a more productive discussion were there not so many people treating Jews as a monolith. There is no issue in even the smallest Jewish community where that is true, in the past or the present. My dealings with Jews throughout my life have been both extensive and overwhelmingly positive.]

Recently-and by recently I mean since the internet began- it seems that all conversations on the right are taking place in the shadow of the dreaded ‘Jewish Question,’ which has little to do with actual Jews or their nefarious gefiltescheming and far more to do with which goys are in their employ. This is the hushtoned and secretive ‘controlled opposition’- one hesitates to call them quislings on account of the fact that Vidkund Quisling definitely wasn’t He-brewing up degeneracy on behalf of the Sanhedrin… or was he? That’s the point of course. One could argue that the fact that his craven, over-the-top connivance with Hitler’s regime was so repulsive that his name became a byword for traitor was part of the plan all along. I mean, his middle name was Abraham after all- just check the “early life” section for full confirmation.

Vidkun Quisling, taken from life.

Not long ago,

Morgthorak the Undead

posted the allegation that

New Right Poast

was basically just promo for Shlomo. As both New Right Poast and Morgthorak have done right by me in the past, and both have kindly restacked my work (the former showcasing it in numerous posts) I feel I should address this particular point and the broader trend behind it. Hopefully, this will be received in the spirit of constructive criticism.

The trouble, as I understand it from the threads, began with a comment from an account called @barca , who commented on one of Morthorak’s posts thusly:

Morgthorak responded that this was “a provocative and interesting comment.” Perhaps he was just being polite to a commenter, because it’s hard to see what would justify that. Barca didn’t cite any evidence for labeling NRP as such, nor even provide a rationale. No one else in the comments had mentioned NRP; the attack comes out of nowhere. The words are just there, stark and botlike (save for the misspelling), from an account that has no presence on Substack at all beyond restacking posts critical of Jews and Israel and the occasional comment along those lines.

Morgthorak would go on to build an entire piece on this foundation, however. He posits that NRP has less engagement than one should expect from a publication with more than 4,000 subscribers, that its lack of paid subscribers is odd for a Stack that must require a lot of work, and that even the name of the anon behind the account,

Dudley Newright

, is certainly the product of some committee looking to appeal to DR readers. Most pointedly, he wonders how NRP could be ignoring him when he has written so much dissident right material, and attributes this to his hard-line anti-Zionist stance. He ends “Beware of the New Right Poast” with this admonition:

Frens, beware of the New Right Poast. My guess is that much of what they publish is selected based on the needs of Israel, not on the goals or ideas of the dissident right in the West. What you get from them is likely designed to manipulate you, control you, and ensure that you ultimately end up on the side of Israel.

Is that what you want? To be controlled and used? To be corralled into an ideological box controlled by someone with the insipid name of Dudley Newright? 🙄

The New Right Poast reeks of astroturfing. Beware.

At no point anywhere in the essay does Morgthorak provide any evidence that NRP is controlled or funded by Israel. The closest he comes is a screenshot of a comment from-yet again- Barca:

Perhaps others might interpret this differently, but I read this as Dudley Newright being genuinely confused and mildly perturbed that some troll is making OT accusations in his comment section. If I were scrolling through a post of mine on the War in Ukraine and saw that someone had asked “RU gay bro?” I would probably respond likewise.

It seems true that NRP gets around the same engagement as Morgthorak despite having about four times as many followers. But is it really that significant? Morgthorak publishes topical pieces with attention-grabbing titles. He writes about current events and big, newsworthy names. NRP is an insider-baseball publication dealing with topics of interest not even to the general political right, but particular factions of the online right. It’s a trade journal for DR poasters. Dudley Newright aggregates the work of others into serial compilations with light and knowing commentary. I suspect it’s they, more than he, who benefit from the traffic generated, with many people subscribing to get a Reader’s Digest for frens and then just moving through to the links while unfortunately skipping the like button.

From my own experience writing a type of online review like that I can say that my issues of Sub Mille got about 2/3 the likes and views of my normal posts at the time. I suspect the same might have been true when

John Carter

did his. Both of us were quite content to cede that space to Dudley Newright, as it was a great deal of work for little return beyond the fun of completing a labor of love. In fact, had I known he was working on it at the time I was doing mine I never would have began in the first place.

I’ve called out writers who seem astroturfed. To me, they’re easy to spot. They’re the repeaters, the ones who hit regime talking points, have tens of thousands of subscribers, orange or even purple check marks, but can’t summon interest in anything they write. NRP has amassed around 4,000 subscribers in two years and has little in the way of paid subs. That doesn’t strike me as anything like fake on its face. We all know the stereotypes, but I’m pretty sure there’d be a few shekels to spare for someone able to “coral [sic] right wing dissidents around influencers for Israel” to hit at least orange level if that was what was happening. And Morgthorak seems to want it both ways. He wonders that NRP is willing and able to do what he does for free but then sees it as equally suspicious that he hopes to get a paid subscriber base one day. Dudley Newright is both pretending not to be funded and pretending to seek funding. One might be forgiven for thinking he’s simply working hard on something meaningful to him in the hopes that he will one day be able to make a full-time career of it. And as for his screen name- I honestly think it’s clever.

Occam’s Razor or threatened circumcision?

The vagaries of likes and comments and shares are beyond my understanding. Were I some marketing maven I might have more insight, but I honestly can’t say why some of my posts get the response they do. Of my last three essays, the one that was a response to

Constantin von Hoffmeister

on what I thought would be of limited interest got the most likes and restacks; the one on video games and culture, which I thought would be more popular, got 2/3 as many likes and has barely broken 2,000 views, while my latest, on public schools, is on track to being more popular than both. It has fewer likes than some I’ve written, but more comments than others. Maybe it’s when I posted them. Maybe it’s who shared them. There’s probably someone at Substack central command with those answers, but frankly they don’t interest me. I write because I have something to say, not to achieve some level of popularity, which is outside my hands in any case.

My piece on Christianity and paganism got mentioned in NRP, as did my most recent essay on public schools- but not what I wrote on video games. Why? I don’t know. I don’t know why I didn’t get mentioned in “Best Reads of 2024- So Far.” But the thing is, it doesn’t matter. Yes, it’s great when people appreciate your work, but it’s not a matter of political significance that someone overlooks this person or that person this week or that, or even altogether. At one point I had no idea who Dudley Newright was even though we were writing the same type of material and enjoyed roughly the same level of popularity. Maybe he didn’t know who Morgthorak was- until recently.

As for Dudley Newright being a shill for Israel, that just seems absurd. His latest post features him coming down on the pro side of an argument about whether Jews killed Jesus, which as he correctly notes (citing a tweet from

Darryl Cooper

) is theologically true but has nothing to do with hating individual Jews. As

Daniel D

pointed out in a comment, NRP frequently platforms critics of Israel; John Carter and Neoliberal Feudalism come to mind. I can’t recall ever once reading anything at all in NRP that comes close to the “our greatest ally” regime line or anything more subtle. It’s simply a baseless accusation.

History is full of them.

But I don’t want to pick on Morgthorak, because I don’t think the impetus for this ultimately came from him. That credit belongs to the person mentioned in the post prior to Morgthorak’s take on the NRP, “Trevor Goodchild on right-wing gatekeeping in online media.” Goodchild is a familiar type to anyone with experience in DR spaces; I’ve had my own run-ins with them. Their most salient characteristics are childish anger and narcissism. They stake out extreme positions mainly because it affords them the opportunity to call other people stupid sheep and blast the internet with all the racial and religious slurs they wish they could use in daily life. Their output is invariably hateful, miserable doomerism. Their own (ostensible) side is always destined to lose because everyone is just too damn stupid or co-opted to embrace the wisdom on offer from the Gammafuhrer. And that profound insight, the key to everything, is that an all-powerful cabal of Jews runs the world.

I don’t address this topic often because I find these people so tiresome and talking to them is wholly pointless. And yes, they WILL show up, like Beetlejuice, if you say Jew three times. I suspect this sort of avoidance is true of many on the right who want to get on with building something and not wade through a swamp of Der Stürmer-tier hot takes every time they post something. But it might be useful here to look at what Goodchild has to say as illustrative of what animates this sort of person and how we on the right should understand it.

Beetlejews?

I apologize in advance for quoting the slurs Goodchild uses. I don’t use this language in my personal life nor do I share these sentiments. To those inclined to call me PC I will say I don’t use them because they’re beneath me, the jargon of a lower type of person. Robert E. Lee owned actual slaves and wouldn’t be caught dead with words like this in his mouth.

The way that kikes gatekeep RW individuals of various ages and intelligence levels involves a complex ecosystem of interlinked online and media personalities. It is important to remember that while these individuals may, at times, quibble over minor points they will never, ever do one of the following:

-Directly address the JQ (the fact that jews are a parasitic humanoid subrace that always inflicts negative side effects on the host society they are currently infesting)

-Directly threaten the play-pretend fake nation of pissrael

“Complex ecosystem” is smart enough-sounding by itself to require no further elaboration, so don’t look for it to follow. At no point is there any proof offered beyond innuendo that anyone is funded or controlled by Jewish organizations. The heuristic here is that you can easily tell who’s working for the Jews- it’s anyone who refuses to call them parasites. It’s unclear how a podcaster could actually “directly threaten” Israel, but just go with it.

Please remember the above two points. The ultimate goal of this entire faggot network is to prevent emergence of a White Freikorps (young White men banding together to fight for their own personal interests) and above all else to prevent Funny Mustache Man 2.0 from happening.

Hitler killed more white men in pointless war than any central-casting Happy Merchant could ever dream of. Nazism is the abjectly stupidest and objectively most anti-white ideology possible. I think preventing a sequel to that is a perfectly laudable goal.

Starting from the lowest intellectual tier and moving upwards, let's start to identify the various tiers and players:

1. The established boomer plantation. Best represented by Fox News and Breitbart. Very simple soundbites and storylines. "Only democracy in the Middle East, ARE [sic] greatest ally, etc." Basically meant for pure TV watchers. Very low effort but it works to keep the niggercattle pacified.

Breibart isn’t on TV, but yes, Fox News is pro-Israel. Also, no one under fifty watches it. My boomer father doesn’t even watch it. I thought this was about young white men.

2. Pure media astroturf aimed at younger audiences. Ben Shapiro and his comprador golems. Basically what an older kike would think White kids would like. Snarky commentary and better video editing. Not very effective because the newer generation of chosenites doesn't know how to handle the White kids growing up in the low trust society that they have directly created. Very small audience and capture rate.

It’s not very effective and has a small audience and it’s also at the center of a complex ecosystem of Jewish control that’s the only thing keeping young white men from launching another holocaust that didn’t happen.

3. Midwit pseudo-academic journals. 'National Review' and the like. No real audience outside the Beltway. Once effective in the era of obvious faggot Bill Buckley to keep the educated "conservative" White men in line. Now almost completely defunct. You only really see them in diehards like the NeverTrump crowd and sad relicts like Victor Davis Hanson.

I’m actually at a loss here as to how the Jews exercise control. Fox News is just for dumb TV addicts, Ben Shapiro gets no engagement, and National Review is defunct. So where is this complex ecosystem that’s so effective in preventing young white men from kristallnachting everyone?

4. Online grifters and e-merchants. Think Mike Thernobich and Dim Fool (Tim Pool) and Clott Adams. These are pure mercenaries that live and die via interactions and e-clout and will very carefully dogwhistle periodically to RW White men for shekels. They will immediately react with absolute hostility if you threaten their precious income streams or social media accounts. Will whore themselves out to the highest bidder. Kikes have no fear of these clowns, they just buy them off.

Ok, so maybe this is it. But of the three people he mentions, only one actually claims to be right wing. Tim Pool is a left-libertarian and Scott Adams is a Democrat. It’s not really clear to me if Goodchild actually knows much about the dissident right as opposed to just repeating secondhand takes from people unloading more generalized resentments. Also, most people tend to get hostile if you threaten their income streams.

5. Online ostensibly "RW" personalities. These are the most dangerous ones because they have deliberately cultivated a following of young, clever RW White men, are frequently if not always pseudonymous, and they dabble in saying the nigger-word. Best represented by BAP (Bronze Age Pervert), a poorly closeted jew faggot, and his associated circle. A lot of these losers are what I like to call "temporarily embarrassed academics": they're basically frustrated also-rans who want conservative think-tank sinecures or want to found their own National Review 2.0 and get paid by the pig system while telling you how horrible the pig system is (but don't do anything about it, or ever name the chosenite ethnicity putting their boot on your neck, White man). Second City Bureaucrat (screencap below) is another perfect example. There are hundreds of others.

And it’s here that the dam breaks and all the envy and spite and ignorant malice pours out in a rant against “online ostensibly ‘RW’ personalities,” who (unlike Goodchild) have “cultivated a following of young, clever RW White men.” The only ones he mentions by name are BAP- who is probably also the most well-known, hence the special animosity- and Second City Bureaucrat, who also has a significant following online. Projecting, he calls them “frustrated also-rans” who secretly want positions in the mainstream conservative movement despite their doing quite well without them and having no real ideological or personal connection to anyone in that area (other than being mentioned by more astute commentators like Tucker Carlson and Michael Anton). They’re losers despite their obvious success because they won’t ‘name the Jew,’ even when they do. They’re pseudonymous (as is Trevor Goodchild), they tell you how horrible the “pig system” is (which is all Goodchild does), but won’t do anything about it (other than write books that have influenced the course of contemporary RW thought enormously, including introducing important concepts and vocabulary even into mainstream discourse). I don’t read much Bronze Age Pervert, I don’t follow him, and I’ve written critically about Nietzsche and his followers many times. But there are points where we agree and I think he does a lot of good, especially as he inspires young men to work out and dream big. I wish him well, and I’m happy for his success. Like him or not, he’s done a lot.

F*** you for making me defend him.

What has Goodchild done? Nothing, but it’s because the Jews won’t let him. He’d be a freikorps commando were it not for them confining him to his Gab-bunker. Were it not for a conspiracy involving the geriatrics at Fox, Ben Shapiro’s tiny audience, right-wing Bernie Bros like Scott Adams, and lots and lots of homosexuals, Trevor Goodchild would emerge as the secret king the world needs, but doesn’t deserve. I use the phrase Gammafuhrer for a reason.

In the end, this sort of discourse is toxic. It’s ignorant, self-indulgent, weak-minded, off-putting, gossipy-effeminate, and above all demoralizing. It tells people, especially young rightists, that the system is invincibly stacked against them, that there is no hope while the Jew has his boot on your neck, that he controls every aspect of your culture, your economy, your life- this alien presence so pervasive as to require a total revolution in all aspects of politics and society before anything like a normal life is possible, and anyone who succeeds in this system is not to be commended for their hard work and vision but slandered as a paid tool of the oppressor. For all of Trevor Goodchild’s use of the word ‘nigger,’ there is nothing so reminiscent of his mindset as a bunch of fever-dream-stereotype dope-smoking hood rats standing on a street corner doing nothing, day-in and day-out, all the while blaming whitey for their lack of progress. Blacks with dignity shun degeneracy like that, as white men with self-respect and pride should similarly distain such craven defeatism.

Of course, were I conspiracy-minded, I might imagine a different scenario than mere envypoasting from a man whose main joy in reaching adulthood was that he could no longer be forced to take his meds. Were I working for Big Jew Inc., tasked with creating an op to shut down those pesky goyim who can see, here’s what I might do:

• Constantly point out how Jews run everything and that attempting to better yourself or do anything positive just plays into their hands. College = Jews; Job = Jews; Family = Jews; Church = you know it . . . JEWS!!!

• Use a lot of racial and ethnic slurs so that impressionable young people (and unstable older people) think I’m edgy and real. I’ll make sure to disparage using pseudonyms (while using one myself) to get as many screenshots as possible of people liking my liberal use of ‘kike’ under their real names. Might be useful later.

• Run down every right wing author or online personality I can. It doesn’t matter that I don’t show any evidence of really being that familiar with DR spaces and people, to the point where I call Tim Pool a RW grifter. The important thing is that I create the impression that I’m taking on the big names even if I only actually know a few of them. I can just throw out that there are hundreds (heck, why not thousands) of RW writers who are on-leave-from-Tel-Aviv and let the imaginations of my followers do the work for me. That guy telling you to pray and get married and work out is a Zionist; real dissidents just name the Jew on the internet all day and wait for the revolution.

• I might also throw in a lot of pro-Putin and antivaxx stuff just to make sure people associate criticism of the War in Ukraine and Covid policies with my own views on ZOG. Again, more handy screenshots so my friends in the media will have an easier time linking them all as well for the benefit of the public.

• Above all, my job is to be a gatekeeper. I will be as ugly, hateful, negative, malicious, accusatory, jealous, and obnoxious as possible. I want everyone’s first and only impression of the right to be me calling him a faggot for listening to Matt Walsh. I want to turn every space- every comment section, every chatroom, every livestream, every feed- into a showcase for my own preoccupations. Did you work hard creating a weekly compendium of rightist thought? Well, I’ll just show up and badger you about being a Zio-shill. It works because writers, no matter how confident they seem, always worry on some level how their work will be received, and if I can undermine someone’s confidence just that much, oy vey.

Of course, I don’t believe in conspiracies, but still . . .