Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Obsidian Blackbird.'s avatar

May I recommend, Bad Boy Bubby and The Proposition as a counterpoint

Expand full comment
Shade of Achilles's avatar

Gallipoli is also a very spiritually right-wing film in its adoration of the physical beauty and tragic manliness of the diggers (it's got a Homeric atmosphere, which I suspect was intentional; such was certainly an element of Australian war propaganda at the time, a more literate age). It *is* an antiwar film but mostly in the right sort of way, if you know what I mean.

In the blue skies contrasted with red and ochre earth, the deliberate aural merging of the screeching of cockatoos into the nasal whooping of stockmen and many other images it's a patriotic film with a preternatural apprehension and appreciation of the Australian landscape. There's also admiration for the pioneering spirit and its resolve to maintain Anglo civility in the unheeding bush (you picked up on this also in Picnic at Hanging Rock), but it also hints strongly at the alienation of the struggling British-descended settler from an environment spiritually remote from him.

However, there's a sense (and this is the only thing I don't like about it) in which it's peddling the wrong kind of patriotism. It bears a republican, anti Old Country chip on the shoulder: the stuff about the British drinking tea on landing at Suvla Bay while the diggers vault suicidally out of the trenches into machine gun fire at The Nek is patently wrong and no better than a cheap shot designed to play up to old Australian anti-English sentiment.

This anti-Pom strain in Australian patriotism was sort of historically justifiable and mostly good natured before about 1960 but metamorphosed into a burning impulse--first among the turbulent Irish (going much further back actually), then among Greek, Croat, Italian etc. post-war migrants and more latterly among Chinese, Arabs, Indians, you name it--to sever the country from its British origins and to replace the old country ties with...a congeries of resentful subaltern identities (aka 'multiculturalism'). That's where 'republicanism' got us in the end--and all without our ever becoming a republic.

The film indeed gives a subtle nod towards the ethnosectarian rift in Australia (British Protestant vs. Irish Catholic), present until at least the 1970s and comes down lightly on the side of the Irish. But it's no big deal and doesn't ruin the film for me.

It's also funny:

Major Barton, interrogating prospective volunteer recruits, to Mel Gibson as Frank Dunn: 'Any previous military experience DUNN?

Dunn: 'Yes Sir--five years in the Melbourne horse cadets'

Barton: Never heard of em

Dunn: 'Well...no Sir...They never got as much recognition as they deserved Sir...'

The acting is wonderful. Mel Gibson is of course magnificent, as is Mark Lee as Archie Hamilton. I never understood why he didn't kick on afterwards--he was extremely handsome and very talented.

The depictions of the residual Victorian atmosphere of British imperial culture in Cairo, the souq and the pyramids, the Greek prostitutes in the brothels are so true you can almost smell em.

Most of all it shows the viscosity of bonds between young men--a sort of colonial mannerbund. We call it 'mateship' and fool ourselves that it's uniquely Australian. If the last 10 or 15 minutes (especially the final few frames) don't get you, nothing will.

It's my favourite film by far by my favourite director--by anybody in fact--but maybe you have to be (a certain kind of) old-stock Australian to really feel it.

Witness is probably Weir's next best (hard to choose between it and Master and Commander). I particularly commend to you the barn-raising scene, one of the greats.

Anyway apologies for going on and on and thanks for the amusing and perceptive article, with its due recognition of Peter Weir

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts